Abstract
Restorative of Justice (RJ) is flipsides to the central punitive justice system. It is a more comprehensive way that covers victims, offenders, and communities. This research supplements current research by seeking feedback from RJ high level advisors and designer on the impact of RJ methods on criminal re-entry and satisfaction with victims and communities. Restorative justice is more than just victim arbitration, though it is often involved. Although financing is viewed as a significant test, the main test distinguished by members is a change in outlook in the way criminal equity is seen. The values of restorative justice reflect to a large extent the values of self-determination, personality, acceptance, and responsibility of social work. To align the regulations with the ethics of social work, social specialists must be aware of this concept so that they can actively support their clients, as well as fairer and more principled national and national policies. Simultaneously, social specialists must be alert that combining the parts of doctors and justice facilitators may be harmful to justice.